Category Archives: Home Invasion

Our Voice: Adding Insult To Injury

A Roseville man was recently convicted of home invasion and killing and torturing an animal. Not only did he break into an elderly woman’s house, he put her cat in the front loading washing machine, turned it on, and killed the cat. Talk about adding insult to injury. Read more about Ty-Shawn Bost here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37739900/ns/local_news-detroit_mi/

Michigan law makes it a felony to kill, torture, maim, disfigure or mutilate an animal. There are some exclusions, such as hunting, fishing and rodent control. This felony is punishable by up to four years in prison, $5,000 to $20,000 in fines, up to 500 hours community service and psychological counseling.

Ty-Shawn Bost was sentenced to two to ten years for both crimes.

Are Michigan laws tough enough on those who intentionally hurt animals?

jill@ambroselawgroup.com

Add to Google Buzz

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Home Invasion

What Makes a House a Home?

We’ve been debating at the office whether a person can be convicted of Home Invasion Second Degree if the dwelling is vacant. We got Phil to do some research and here’s the best answer:

The issue is whether a person can be convicted of Home Invasion Second Degree of a vacant home. The short answer is yes. Under the Michigan statute, for a person to be guilty of home invasion second degree, the structure in question must be a “dwelling,” defined as a structure or shelter, which is used permanently or temporarily as a place of abode. In 2008, the Michigan Court of Appeals determined that if a structure is temporarily vacant but the inhabitant intends to return, it remains a dwelling. People v. Powell, 278 Mich. App. 318, 322 (2008). The court determined that the duration of the inhabitant’s absence and habitability of the structure do not preclude it from being a dwelling, because the establishment of the structure as a dwelling depends upon the inhabitant’s intent to return. Id. In a 2009 unpublished Michigan Court of Appeals case, People v. Hogan, Docket No. 286421, the court applied the Powell case to a vacant house that was up for sale. The court concluded that because the owner purchased the house for the purpose of selling it to others to reside in, never intended for it to be used for any other purpose, and kept it in move-in condition, it was a dwelling for the purpose of Home Invasion Second Degree. As a result of Hogan, a court would likely conclude that a vacant rental home is also a dwelling.


Leave a comment

Filed under Home Invasion